From the "Canadian Jewish News"...
The government-sanctioned killings in Darfur continue unabated. More than 400,000 people have been slaughtered in the ethnic conflict in western Sudan under the Bashir regime. Now nearing the five-year mark, with no end in sight, the genocide continues, and the toll rises by 10,000 deaths each month.
Still, there are beginning to be small glimmers of hope, a recent panel organized by Canadian Jewish Congress, Quebec region (CJC-Q) said.
Last week, Liberal[-party] human-rights critic Irwin Cotler was to table in Parliament a petition with 300 signatures. It called on Stephen Harper’s government to intervene more diplomatically, and to impose a series of sanctions – from seizures to boycotts to divestment – if the Sudanese government continues to flout international demands to desist from the slaughter and adhere to ceasefire agreements.
Still, the feeling of despair is difficult to shed was the message conveyed by the panel, which was part of last month’s Holocaust Education Series.
Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz, who has been at the forefront in advocating on behalf of the people of Darfur, stressed that the Jewish community, with its Holocaust legacy, bears a “particular obligation” to ensure that “never again” means just that.
“I am here as a rabbi and a Jew, but mainly as a human being,” Rabbi Steinmetz said, lamenting the fact that the audience was filled mostly with faces [that] he already recognized as being familiar with the issue.
“It’s the usual suspects in the room,” he said. “That’s a tragedy,” and an apparent indication that the Darfur issue still does not rate high on the Jewish community’s radar.
Rabbi Reuben Poupko said [that] the phrase “never again” is a reflection of a certain “hubris” that existed before the slaughter in Rwanda and Darfur, among others. “Now we say it with a sort of ironic resignation,” he said.
The heart of the evening was reserved for figures who had witnessed such horrors and [...] returned to tell the tale.
Jean-Paul Nyilinkwaya, a founder of PAGE Rwanda, a Montreal-based group that advocates for and helps friends and relatives of genocide victims, said [that] there is little to be learned from Rwanda that would help Darfur. His father and many relatives died in Rwanda.
The common denominator, though, is “the fundamental indifference of the world community,” he said.
In Rwanda, using the term “genocide” used to be taboo. But even though it no longer is, “using [the term] now is not compelling anyone to do anything.
“The only positive thing is that we are here tonight. The optimist in me is always looking for signs of hope. I’m not ready to give up on humanity yet. International justice can serve as a deterrent.”
Justin Laku, of the Canadian Friends of Sudan, said [that] he is returning to Sudan in mid-December to monitor the situation. He praised Cotler – “my mentor” – and referred to the unimaginable levels of torture and rape occurring on a daily basis, noting the “silent genocide” that took place in the Nuba region of Sudan a decade ago.
Laku was in Baghdad in 2004-05 and recalled Roméo Dallaire’s explanation as to why we didn’t see western countries intervene in Rwanda.
“There’s no oil in Rwanda,” he said.
Dallaire presided over the ill-fated UN peacekeeping force in Rwanda in 1993-94.
John Weiss, a history professor at Cornell University, said [that] no actions have yet been effective in the Darfur crisis, in part because access to the area is made as difficult as possible. This “access control,” he said, allows the world to not be sensitized to the massacres, and to carry on with a confidant level of impunity. Even the United Nations “ignored warnings for a long time.”
The efforts to control access even includes physical intimidation, where visitors can be “shoved around and even thrown against a wall. It’s the instrumentation of chaos,” he said.
A newspaper essay written by Weiss and published the same day as the panel discussion discounted any positive role to be played by the UN by a “hybrid force” of 26,000 peacekeepers – called UNAMID – “wearing UN blue helmets but commanded by officers of the repeatedly discredited and Darfuri-detested African Union, an organization dominated by the Sudanese regime.
“The UN Security Council fell into a carefully laid trap when it passed Resolution 1769 authorizing the deployment of this bizarrely structured force.”
In the article and at the panel discussion, Weiss indicated that the best hope for salvation for the people of Darfur lies in restoring their control over their own destiny.
“It will take the willingness of outsiders to risk political and human assets [in order] to accomplish this shift,” Weiss wrote. “So far, not a single country has shown an interest in taking such a risk.”
On every seat in the room was a booklet prepared by Weiss called Darfur: The Final Solution. It listed a number of ways “to end the genocide,” including imposing sanctions, “close monitoring” of UNAMID and insisting that the Canadian government set up a joint Darfur-planning committee that could operate at arm’s length from the Foreign Ministry.
Speaking to reporters last week, Cotler noted that two Sudanese officials indicted by the International Criminal Court have yet to be handed over to the court to face justice.
One of them was Ahmed Haround, whose ironic title is Minister of Humanitarian Affairs.
In effect he is “being awarded for his criminality,” Cotler said. “A more-flagrant example of the culture of impunity would be hard to find.”
Social change for the next generation
Young girl with infant child at refugee camp in Darfur. Photo by Dan Scandling, Office of U.S. Representative Frank Wolf